Stefan Sperling <s...@elego.de> writes: > On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 03:12:22PM +0530, Arwin Arni wrote: > >> On Tuesday 28 June 2011 03:01 PM, Noorul Islam K M wrote: >> >>+svn bisect start [-rN[:M]] >> >>+ >> >When we discussed you had a concern that above syntax is different from >> >the normal svn sub command syntax. Is this finalized? >> > >> >> I wouldn't say it's finalized.. I simply wrote down a spec as a rough draft. >> I'm sure the community will have some ideas about this. (Like implementing >> a sub-subcommand interface of some sort.) > > I'd say just have a set of long options that are mutually exclusive, > one for each "subcommand". > > svn bisect --start > svn bisect --good > etc. > > This will be easiest to do with the current argument parsing code, and > also means people can type things in any order they like (--good -r42, > or -r42 --good).
Do we really need to use -r to mention revision? How about --good <rev> --bad <rev> ? Is this complicated with the existing parser? Thanks and Regards Noorul
