ar...@apache.org writes: > Author: arwin > Date: Tue Jun 28 08:43:40 2011 > New Revision: 1140482 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1140482&view=rev > Log: > Added a branch readme. > * BRANCH-README : New file. > > Added: > subversion/branches/svn-bisect/BRANCH-README > > Added: subversion/branches/svn-bisect/BRANCH-README > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/svn-bisect/BRANCH-README?rev=1140482&view=auto > ============================================================================== > --- subversion/branches/svn-bisect/BRANCH-README (added) > +++ subversion/branches/svn-bisect/BRANCH-README Tue Jun 28 08:43:40 2011 > @@ -0,0 +1,70 @@ > +This branch exists for the implementation of the svn bisect command. > +It is maintained as a reintegrate-able branch with regular catch-up > +merges from trunk. > + > +PURPOSE > +======= > + > +For years, subversion users have used third-party scripts to do what > +should rightfully be a part of subversion itself. This branch aims > +to implement bisect functionality and make it available via the > +public API. > + > + > +SPEC > +==== > + > +svn bisect start [-rN[:M]] > +
When we discussed you had a concern that above syntax is different from the normal svn sub command syntax. Is this finalized? > +Initialize the bisection state. > +If a state already exists, clean it up and create a fresh one. > +If a revision range is specified, limit bisection to this range. > +If a single revision is specified, bisect from that revision to HEAD. > +If no revision is specified, bisect from revision 1 to HEAD. Does this mean that N will be set a bad and M will be good revision initially? Thanks and Regards Noorul
