On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Julian Foad <[email protected]> wrote:
> Just a thought: is the upgrade time linear with WC size? If so, I say
> "good enough", if much worse than linear, probably not good enough.
>
> - Julian
Hi Julian,
To get a rough idea I ran upgrade on some bigger WCs this weekend:
WC for | Files | Dirs | Size on Disk | Elapsed
Upgrade Time
----------------------------------------------------------------------
^/subversion/tags/1.6.7[1] | 3,214 | 449 | 69.3 MB | 00:02:04
----------------------------------------------------------------------
^/subversion/tags/ebcdic[2] | 14,703 | 1,826 | 313.0 MB | 00:11:44
| x 4.57 | x4.07 | x 4.52 | x 5.65
----------------------------------------------------------------------
^/subversion/branches[2] | 91,534 | 9,720 | 2.16 GB | 03:46:10
| x28.47 | x21.64| x88.15 | x108.70
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So upgrade performance is roughly linear with WC size. Why upgrade is
so slow on my Windows box as compared to Philip's linux box are
another matter, one which I'll touch on elsewhere in this thread in a
few minutes.
Paul
[1] Using trunk@1133033 (results from earlier in this thread)
[2] Using trunk@1130808
