On 06/07/2011 03:22 PM, Paul Burba wrote: > 3) Is there a general sense that upgrade performance is currently > adequate? Do we really care if upgrade is slower than a checkout, as > long as it is in the ballpark? After all, this is a one-and-done > operation for most users.
As you said, for most folks it's one-and-done. I certainly don't run 'svn upgrade' often enough to have a feel for its performance. But, man, I have trouble imagining that our users will be anything but appalled that it is somehow faster to download all new copies of their files and such from the network than just to fiddle with WC administrative data. Especially considering the fact that our primary "sell" of 1.7 is precisely that such admin fiddling is supposed to be faster with WC-NG. Knowwhatimean? > 4) When we release 1.7 what will our default recommendation be > (assuming the user has no local changes)? Upgrade or fresh checkout? > I'm assuming the former, but are we open to the latter if performance > is a problem? I wouldn't propose an answer to this question until I knew more about upgrade's performance characteristics nearer our release time. Out of curiosity, though, how are you affected if others do have a strong opinion about it? -- C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net> CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
