Stefan Sperling wrote on Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 09:29:14 +0200: > On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:45:52PM -0000, danie...@apache.org wrote: > > Author: danielsh > > Date: Fri Jun 10 23:45:51 2011 > > New Revision: 1134484 > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1134484&view=rev > > Log: > > Verify FS paths for validity during dump. Follow-up to r1129641, which > > added > > validation to 'verify'. > > > + expected_stderr = [ > > + "* Dumped revision 0.\n", > > + "WARNING 0x0002: E160005: " > > Do we really need to print the "0x0002:"? > That seems unnecessary. >
No strong feelings here. > > + "While validating fspath '?\\230': " > > + "Path '?\\230' is not in UTF-8" > > + "\n",
