On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:45:52PM -0000, danie...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: danielsh
> Date: Fri Jun 10 23:45:51 2011
> New Revision: 1134484
> 
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1134484&view=rev
> Log:
> Verify FS paths for validity during dump.  Follow-up to r1129641, which added
> validation to 'verify'.
 
> +  expected_stderr = [
> +    "* Dumped revision 0.\n",
> +    "WARNING 0x0002: E160005: "

Do we really need to print the "0x0002:"?
That seems unnecessary.

> +      "While validating fspath '?\\230': "
> +      "Path '?\\230' is not in UTF-8"
> +      "\n",
> +    "* Dumped revision 1.\n",
> +    ]
>    exit_code, output, errput = svntest.main.run_svnadmin("dump", 
> sbox.repo_dir)
>    if svntest.verify.compare_and_display_lines(
>      "Output of 'svnadmin dump' is unexpected.",
> -    'STDERR', ["* Dumped revision 0.\n",
> -               "* Dumped revision 1.\n"], errput):
> +    'STDERR', expected_stderr, errput):
>      raise svntest.Failure
>  
>  ########################################################################
> 

Reply via email to