On 19.05.2011 11:53, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 09:38:55PM +0200, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> Why? That doesn't make sense. Second of all, all these wordy aliases are
>> just shorthands for real timestamps anyway -- by your reasoning, you
>> could eliminate all of them.
> There is otherwise no way to express dates relative to the current time.
So instead of introducing a subset of the silliness that was in CVS, why
then don't you invent an unambiguous format that /can/ express dates
relative to the current time?
For example, you might support: svn -r {-1.12:13:56}, meaning one day,
twelve hours, 13 minutes and 56 seconds ago.
-- Brane
