Stefan, please could you put those explanations in the log message? - Julian
On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 08:35 +0200, C. Michael Pilato wrote: > On 05/19/2011 08:11 AM, Stefan Küng wrote: > >> Hrm. I rather expected that this change would have two components: > >> > >> 1. Remove references to 'svn' subcommands from share lib error messages. > >> 2. From the same places, return unique-enough error codes that the client > >> catches so *it* can give those same client-specific suggestions. > >> > >> Looks like only step #1 was done here. Were you intending to take this > >> further? > > > > In checkout.c, I'm pretty sure an update doesn't help: why would an > > update do anything good in case of a failed checkout because a folder > > is already a working copy for a different url? IMHO that update hint > > was wrong in the first place. --> an update does not change the fact > > that there's a working copy from another repo in the way. > > > > In upgrade.c, a different error code won't help since the cleanup has > > to be done with an 1.6 client (i.e., a client with an older version). > > So a client simply can not act on this and do the cleanup itself. > > Thanks for the explanation of your reasoning. I concur. >
