On 05/19/2011 08:11 AM, Stefan Küng wrote: >> Hrm. I rather expected that this change would have two components: >> >> 1. Remove references to 'svn' subcommands from share lib error messages. >> 2. From the same places, return unique-enough error codes that the client >> catches so *it* can give those same client-specific suggestions. >> >> Looks like only step #1 was done here. Were you intending to take this >> further? > > In checkout.c, I'm pretty sure an update doesn't help: why would an > update do anything good in case of a failed checkout because a folder > is already a working copy for a different url? IMHO that update hint > was wrong in the first place. --> an update does not change the fact > that there's a working copy from another repo in the way. > > In upgrade.c, a different error code won't help since the cleanup has > to be done with an 1.6 client (i.e., a client with an older version). > So a client simply can not act on this and do the cleanup itself.
Thanks for the explanation of your reasoning. I concur. -- C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net> CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
