Sorry, folks. I'm a guilty party here, too. I got cranky about a prior commit that made bogus assumptions about the state of the database, ultimately annoyin^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hencouraging Bert to make this format bump.
On 04/19/2011 05:37 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > Bert: > > I think you should check with the community before doing a format > bump. You're cutting us out of the conversation. > > -g > > On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 17:05, <rhuij...@apache.org> wrote: >> Author: rhuijben >> Date: Tue Apr 19 21:05:28 2011 >> New Revision: 1095214 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1095214&view=rev >> Log: >> Bump our working copy format version to 28 and fixup the remaining MD5 >> references in the NODES table to SHA1. (This also fixes the reference counts) >> >> On any working copy checked out in +- the last half year (and probably >> longer) >> this only bumps the working copy format number. >> >> * subversion/libsvn_wc/upgrade.c >> (bump_to_28): New function. >> (svn_wc__upgrade_sdb): Add bump to 28. >> >> * subversion/libsvn_wc/wc-metadata.sql >> (STMT_UPGRADE_TO_28): Add the bump to format 28 query. >> >> * subversion/libsvn_wc/wc.h >> (SVN_WC__VERSION): Document format 28 and switch to 28. >> >> * subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db_pristine.c >> (svn_wc__db_pristine_read): Revert r1095194, which reverted some parts of >> r1091381. >> >> Modified: >> subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/upgrade.c >> subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc-metadata.sql >> subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc.h >> subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db_pristine.c >> ... -- C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net> CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
