Bert: I think you should check with the community before doing a format bump. You're cutting us out of the conversation.
-g On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 17:05, <rhuij...@apache.org> wrote: > Author: rhuijben > Date: Tue Apr 19 21:05:28 2011 > New Revision: 1095214 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1095214&view=rev > Log: > Bump our working copy format version to 28 and fixup the remaining MD5 > references in the NODES table to SHA1. (This also fixes the reference counts) > > On any working copy checked out in +- the last half year (and probably longer) > this only bumps the working copy format number. > > * subversion/libsvn_wc/upgrade.c > (bump_to_28): New function. > (svn_wc__upgrade_sdb): Add bump to 28. > > * subversion/libsvn_wc/wc-metadata.sql > (STMT_UPGRADE_TO_28): Add the bump to format 28 query. > > * subversion/libsvn_wc/wc.h > (SVN_WC__VERSION): Document format 28 and switch to 28. > > * subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db_pristine.c > (svn_wc__db_pristine_read): Revert r1095194, which reverted some parts of > r1091381. > > Modified: > subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/upgrade.c > subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc-metadata.sql > subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc.h > subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db_pristine.c >...
