On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 22:37, Stefan Fuhrmann <eq...@web.de> wrote: > The fopen() calls should be eliminated by the > file handle cache. IOW, they should already be > addressed on the performance branch. Please > let me know if that is not the case. > Just my 20 cents.
My belief that file handles cache should be implemented at OS level and I pretty sure that it's implemented. And right way to eliminate number of duplicate fopen()/reads() is improving our FS API. I didn't reviewed how file handles cache is implemented in fs-performance branch, but I'm nearly to -1 against implementing cache of open file handles in Subversion. -- Ivan Zhakov
