On 12/21/2010 02:57 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > C. Michael Pilato wrote on Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 14:40:01 -0500: >> Can we fix this? Can we introduce a new error code >> SVN_ERR_RA_DAV_ERROR_CHAIN which means, "the descriptive message of this >> error contains a skel which, when parsed, carries a whole chain of real >> errors? Then we have the client indicate at capabilities-exchange time that >> it can handle that kind of return. >> > > +0. (not a +1 because I don't know the ra_dav protocol well enough) > > Instead of skels, we could re-use svn_ra_svn_write_cmd_failure() and > svn_ra_svn__handle_failure_status(), though.
... and then make the results all XML-safe. *sigh* -- C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net> CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
