Julian Foad <julian.f...@wandisco.com> writes: > On Mon, 2010-12-13, Hyrum K. Wright wrote: > >> Random community nit: The attached log message seems to have little to >> do with email subject of "Input validation observations". > > FYI, I'm watching this thread and intend to respond to this patch, which > is one of a series of patches responding to the observations mentioned > in the subject line. But yes, I see what you mean - the subject line no > longer describes the content of these messages well and so it's not easy > for others to follow. > >> In the >> future, when sending a new patch to the list, I'd recommend starting a >> new thread, complete with it's own "[PATCH] ..." subject, as >> recommended in the patch submission guidelines. It's more likely to >> get noticed than when it's tacked onto the end of a largely-unrelated >> 40-message thread. > > Agreed. Or, in a case like this where the patch is a direct response to > the original thread, I think replying within the thread and changing the > Subject line would be fine. (That would be seen as a new thread by some > mail clients and as part of the same thread by others, but has the > required effect in either case and is simple to do.) > >> Anyway, thanks for the work, I just don't want it to get lost. :) > > Yup, thanks from me too.
I assumed that these were going to be reviewed by Julian. I will keep all these points in mind next time. Thanks and Regards Noorul
