On Mon, 2010-12-13, Hyrum K. Wright wrote: > Random community nit: The attached log message seems to have little to > do with email subject of "Input validation observations".
FYI, I'm watching this thread and intend to respond to this patch, which is one of a series of patches responding to the observations mentioned in the subject line. But yes, I see what you mean - the subject line no longer describes the content of these messages well and so it's not easy for others to follow. > In the > future, when sending a new patch to the list, I'd recommend starting a > new thread, complete with it's own "[PATCH] ..." subject, as > recommended in the patch submission guidelines. It's more likely to > get noticed than when it's tacked onto the end of a largely-unrelated > 40-message thread. Agreed. Or, in a case like this where the patch is a direct response to the original thread, I think replying within the thread and changing the Subject line would be fine. (That would be seen as a new thread by some mail clients and as part of the same thread by others, but has the required effect in either case and is simple to do.) > Anyway, thanks for the work, I just don't want it to get lost. :) Yup, thanks from me too. - Julian
