Bob Fletcher <robert.h.fletc...@ieee.org> writes: > For example, in response to svn --version, I would get > svn, version 1.7.0 (dev build) > compiled Oct 9 2010, 00:09:42 > > As you suggested, I downloaded the binaries just posted today on the same > site. > Now in response to svn --version, I get > svn, version 1.7.0 (dev build) > compiled Oct 11 2010, 00:09:54 > > Based on the compiled dates, I was very skeptical that there > would be any difference. But guess what - the problem went away! > I am not certain that everything works perfectly, > but I no longer get the crash with the bad error message. > > Apparently, something was changed while I was adding noise to the forum.
I'm not sure which revision of Subversion is used in the TSVN nightly builds. The 4603 message is in the Subversion code, it's present in r993028, dated 2010-09-06, and not in r996473, dated 2010-09-13. That's not necessarily when the problem was fixed, it's quite possible that it would have failed with some other error message, but that's when Subversion could produce the 4603 message. I assume that the TSVN nightly has the most recent TSVN code, but that the Subversion code gets updated less frequently -- probably when Stefan determines that a recent Subversion "works". -- Philip
