On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 12:42 +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > > > For me either way is fine: I can update the patch to also detect newer > > versions as suggest by you. Which in turn will still break all the other > > detections of SVN_NEON_0_28 and older. Or we keep them 'in sync' > > together and fix them all together at a later stage. > > The latter please; when Neon 0.39 comes around we'll fix all checks at > the same time.
In this case I would consider my patch complete, as this is already what has been submitted. Thanks for your confirmation; Is there any further action to be taken by myself for this to happen? Dominique
