On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 18:20, Daniel Shahaf <d...@daniel.shahaf.name> wrote: > Perhaps the patch would face more friendly winds if you retained the API > bit, but replaced --fsfs-no-rep-sharing by some more generic --config-option > flag? (compare 'svn --config-option')
I think moving --fsfs-no-rep-sharing under --config-option will be inconsistent with existing options --bdb-txn-nosync and --bdb-log-keep. Besides that --config-option usually sets up environment for command execution rather than directly affects command execution result. Folks do you have any more objections to the patch prevent its applying? -- Simon Atanasyan VisualSVN Limited
