On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Blair Zajac <bl...@orcaware.com> wrote: > On 8/25/10 4:16 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: >> >> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Peter Samuelson<pe...@p12n.org> wrote: >>> >>> Yeah but presumably he's asking because he's linking libsvn_ra_serf to >>> serf 0.3.x now, so the question remains: is 0.7.0 ABI-compatible with >>> 0.3.x? As far as I know, 0.3 is ABI-compatible with 0.2 and 0.1. >> >> Macports is at 0.6.1. IOW, it's already busted now. =( -- justin > > Busted checkouts and operations are better than core dumps :)
Subversion 1.6.12 and serf 0.6.1 from Macports doesn't even do any type of a checkout - it always errors out immediately. Backing up, there are three faults: - API/ABI compatibility - this was broken way back in 0.4.0 - no current 1.6.x release of Subversion can work with anything from serf 0.4.0 or higher. You need the proposed backport to Subversion (1.6.x-r879757) to make 1.6.x work with the serf 0.4.0+ API. - Authn framework fix - this is fixed in 0.7.0. - Memory usage - this is also fixed in 0.7.0. 1.7.x/trunk of Subversion could work with 0.4.0-0.6.1 - this is what Stefan and others reported the memory leaks - but Subversion has never officially released a version that works with serf 0.4.0+. > Can I get an answer to the question? I'm not sure there is any API/ABI changes between 0.6.1 and 0.7.0. Greg? Lieven? -- justin
