Doing the work on trunk or on a branch is orthogonal to my point.
Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote on Sun, 25 Jul 2010 at 16:02 -0000: > Hi Daniel, > > Daniel Shahaf writes: > > i.e., you could have done 'svn cp ../svnrdump/svnrdump.c svnrload.c', > > and similarly for the other files. The benefits of this would be > > reviewability (the diff would be far shorter than the current 1533 > > lines) and historical linkage (future 'svn log', and other, commands > > would trace through the copy). > > I'm sorry, I should have explicitly mentioned that these files aren't > for review. I'm deleting the branch and commiting everything to trunk > in a few minutes (thanks to Bert for suggesting this) -- you can > review the changes then. > > Thanks. > > -- Ram >
