Hi Daniel, Daniel Shahaf writes: > i.e., you could have done 'svn cp ../svnrdump/svnrdump.c svnrload.c', > and similarly for the other files. The benefits of this would be > reviewability (the diff would be far shorter than the current 1533 > lines) and historical linkage (future 'svn log', and other, commands > would trace through the copy).
I'm sorry, I should have explicitly mentioned that these files aren't for review. I'm deleting the branch and commiting everything to trunk in a few minutes (thanks to Bert for suggesting this) -- you can review the changes then. Thanks. -- Ram
