Hello, Our public relations department will be glad to hear that the web site was of use. ;-)
"Well, I quickly checked their website; they're in the pharma business: the business of determining the chances of dying of a pill when you consume it. That definitely explains the paranoia: they're storing law suit evidence in Subversion before it's actually evidence. (Hence the paranoia about the data staying *exactly* what they put in.)" YES, that is exactly the our point. It?s totally uninteresting to anybody how unlikely it was that we lost the evidence that could have shown that the product had been produced with the right ingredients. I better already start to run for it, when I ever approve the use of the current implementation of the representation cache. I?m glad that I found the description of the representation cache suspicious and took a look in the source code. Greetings, Michael Felke Telefon +49 2151 38-1453 Telefax +49 2151 38-1094 michael.fe...@evonik.com Evonik Stockhausen GmbH Bäkerpfad 25 47805 Krefeld http://www.evonik.com Geschäftsführung: Gunther Wittmer (Sprecher), Willibrord Lampen Sitz der Gesellschaft: Krefeld Registergericht: Amtsgericht Krefeld; Handelsregister HRB 5791 This e-mail transmission, and any documents, files or previous e-mail messages attached to it may contain information that is confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you must not read this transmission and that any disclosure, copying, printing, distribution or use of any of the information contained in or attached to this transmission is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately notify the sender by telephone or return e-mail and delete the original transmission and its attachments without reading or saving in any manner. Thank you. Erik Huelsmann <ehu...@gmail.com> 30.06.2010 22:54 An: Daniel Shahaf <d...@daniel.shahaf.name> Kopie: "dev@subversion.apache.org" <dev@subversion.apache.org>, michael.fe...@evonik.com Thema: Re: Antwort: Re: ... Re: dangerous implementation of rep-sharing cache for fsfs On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 10:13 PM, Daniel Shahaf <d...@daniel.shahaf.name> wrote: > [ trim CC ] > > Mark Mielke wrote on Wed, 30 Jun 2010 at 21:37 -0000: >> On 06/30/2010 05:57 AM, michael.fe...@evonik.com wrote: >> > P.S. Thanks for the warning; we are not going to use 1.7. > > Did you check what is the probability of dying in a car accident? Well, I quickly checked their website; they're in the pharma business: the business of determining the chances of dying of a pill when you consume it. That definitely explains the paranoia: they're storing law suit evidence in Subversion before it's actually evidence. (Hence the paranoia about the data staying *exactly* what they put in.) >> > At the Moment we are not using 1.6 either, >> > because of the SHA-1 rep-share cache. > > In 1.6, representation sharing can be DISABLED. Bye, Erik.
