By the way, wc-ng (in Subversion 1.7) will use sha1's for storing pristine texts too. (It will checksum the same contents that fsfs checksums, but currently it doesn't compare filesizes.) So the risk of sha1 collisions (as theoretical or not as it may be) will apply to working copies, too, not just to rep-sharing-undisable fsfs-backed repositories.
- Antwort: Re: dangerous implementation of rep-sharing cac... michael . felke
- Re: Re: dangerous implementation of rep-sharing cac... Mark Phippard
- Re: Re: dangerous implementation of rep-sharing... Martin Furter
- Antwort: Re: Re: dangerous implementation of re... michael . felke
- Re: Antwort: Re: Re: dangerous implementation o... Daniel Shahaf
- Re: Antwort: Re: Re: dangerous implementation o... Daniel Shahaf
- Re: Antwort: Re: Re: dangerous implementation o... C. Michael Pilato
- Re: Re: dangerous implementation of rep-sharing cac... Hyrum K. Wright
- Re: dangerous implementation of rep-sharing cac... Mark Mielke
- Re: dangerous implementation of rep-sharing cac... Daniel Shahaf
- Re: dangerous implementation of rep-sharing cac... Daniel Shahaf
- Re: Antwort: Re: dangerous implementation of rep-sh... Greg Hudson