On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: > [resending; the original has httpd.apache.COM ...] > > On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 15:12, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 05:20, Philip Martin <philip.mar...@wandisco.com> >> wrote: >>> "Bert Huijben" <b...@qqmail.nl> writes: >>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: szukw...@arcor.de [mailto:szukw...@arcor.de] >>>>> Sent: maandag 28 juni 2010 9:51 >>>>> To: dev@subversion.apache.org >>>>> Subject: Re: subversion-1.6.12, apache-2.3.6 >>>>> >>>>> I know that httpd-2.3.x is alpha. Second trial for the patch. >>>> >>>> Thanks for your patch, it came through this time. >>>> To apply the patch to trunk we need code that works on older and newer >>>> versions of httpd (E.g. including proper checking for which version is >>>> being >>>> used). >>>> >>>> I assume you know more about how we should check for specific httpd >>>> versions than we do as you are testing httpd alpha's. >>> >>> I think there is an apache bug here. This is the revision that >>> changed the dav_new_error API (in mod_dav.h): >>> >>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=882274 >>> >>> It includes a change to ap_mmn.h, but that change only modifies the >>> comments, it doesn't change MODULE_MAGIC_NUMBER_MAJOR. Thus callers >>> cannot determine which version of the API to use. >> >> Yup... along with making other changes to keep up with further MMN >> bumps since then. (eg. the AP_LOG_MARK change that OP mentioned)
see r882280
