[resending; the original has httpd.apache.COM ...]
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 15:12, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 05:20, Philip Martin <philip.mar...@wandisco.com> > wrote: >> "Bert Huijben" <b...@qqmail.nl> writes: >> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: szukw...@arcor.de [mailto:szukw...@arcor.de] >>>> Sent: maandag 28 juni 2010 9:51 >>>> To: dev@subversion.apache.org >>>> Subject: Re: subversion-1.6.12, apache-2.3.6 >>>> >>>> I know that httpd-2.3.x is alpha. Second trial for the patch. >>> >>> Thanks for your patch, it came through this time. >>> To apply the patch to trunk we need code that works on older and newer >>> versions of httpd (E.g. including proper checking for which version is being >>> used). >>> >>> I assume you know more about how we should check for specific httpd >>> versions than we do as you are testing httpd alpha's. >> >> I think there is an apache bug here. This is the revision that >> changed the dav_new_error API (in mod_dav.h): >> >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=882274 >> >> It includes a change to ap_mmn.h, but that change only modifies the >> comments, it doesn't change MODULE_MAGIC_NUMBER_MAJOR. Thus callers >> cannot determine which version of the API to use. > > Yup... along with making other changes to keep up with further MMN > bumps since then. (eg. the AP_LOG_MARK change that OP mentioned) > > Cheers, > -g >
