On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Stefan Sperling <s...@elego.de> wrote: > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 01:42:38PM -0500, Hyrum K. Wright wrote: >> The common complaint is that by renumbering the tests, we break historical >> comments such as "fixes bar_test FOO". But those comments are often >> versioned, so a little archaeology can divine the answer. I don't think >> such concerns should keep us from moving forward in the test suite. > > Also, for some time now we've had support to run python tests by passing > the function name as an argument, rather than passing a test number. > So we could encourage people to refer to python tests using their function > names. That would avoid such problems. > Unfortunately this does not work for C tests... > > Back on topic: I don't see a problem with splitting up the merge tests. > > Stefan
Done, http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=948873 Paul
