On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 01:42:38PM -0500, Hyrum K. Wright wrote: > The common complaint is that by renumbering the tests, we break historical > comments such as "fixes bar_test FOO". But those comments are often > versioned, so a little archaeology can divine the answer. I don't think > such concerns should keep us from moving forward in the test suite.
Also, for some time now we've had support to run python tests by passing the function name as an argument, rather than passing a test number. So we could encourage people to refer to python tests using their function names. That would avoid such problems. Unfortunately this does not work for C tests... Back on topic: I don't see a problem with splitting up the merge tests. Stefan
