On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 05:53, Philip Martin <philip.mar...@wandisco.com> wrote: > Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> writes: > >> Okay. So I guess we continue to mark that as sched-delete. > > sched-delete is what we can do in 1.6, but it's not perfect. This is > not a normal delete by the user it's more of an internal Subversion > delete. One of the big differences is that the user cannot revert the > delete, because the information about the node is not available. > wc-ng could distinguish this from a normal delete.
We could distinguish it in some way, yes. At a minimum, we can mark the node excluded when the user reverts the "deletion". (today, 1.6 fails, as I recall) Cheers, -g
