On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 21:34, Hyrum K. Wright <hyrum_wri...@mail.utexas.edu> wrote: > > On Feb 2, 2010, at 11:14 AM, Greg Stein wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 13:01, Justin Erenkrantz <jus...@erenkrantz.com> >> wrote: >>> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Bert Huijben <b...@vmoo.com> wrote: >>>> Should we hold the graduation process on the javahl api changes, or can we >>>> just continue that? >>>> >>>> I would guess that we should have it fixed before release, but that it >>>> doesn't hold the graduation...? >>> >>> I do not see a need to hold graduation until this is fixed in trunk >>> (or a release). >>> >>> As Greg has pointed out before, the key bit - from the Incubator and >>> Board levels - is that there is appropriate oversight being performed >>> by the appropriate people. With those hats on, I'm very very >>> comfortable that is the case. -- justin >> >> Agreed. We know the issue, and we will get it closed out before >> release. As you point out, we have demonstrated appropriate oversight >> and responsibility, just like any other Apache project, to get issues >> like this handled. >> >> I need to update the podling's status page, and then I'll call for a >> vote on gene...@incubator. > > Greg, > Did you have an idea of when you were planning on starting this discussion / > vote? (I assume you can still get bits in and out of northern Virginia... :P > )
I was hoping to do it tomorrow. Before calling the vote, I want to update the incubator status page. Then start the vote. Cheers, -g
