On Feb 2, 2010, at 11:14 AM, Greg Stein wrote: > On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 13:01, Justin Erenkrantz <jus...@erenkrantz.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Bert Huijben <b...@vmoo.com> wrote: >>> Should we hold the graduation process on the javahl api changes, or can we >>> just continue that? >>> >>> I would guess that we should have it fixed before release, but that it >>> doesn't hold the graduation...? >> >> I do not see a need to hold graduation until this is fixed in trunk >> (or a release). >> >> As Greg has pointed out before, the key bit - from the Incubator and >> Board levels - is that there is appropriate oversight being performed >> by the appropriate people. With those hats on, I'm very very >> comfortable that is the case. -- justin > > Agreed. We know the issue, and we will get it closed out before > release. As you point out, we have demonstrated appropriate oversight > and responsibility, just like any other Apache project, to get issues > like this handled. > > I need to update the podling's status page, and then I'll call for a > vote on gene...@incubator.
Greg, Did you have an idea of when you were planning on starting this discussion / vote? (I assume you can still get bits in and out of northern Virginia... :P ) -Hyrum
