On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Mark Phippard <markp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I suppose we could try to use ASF hardware to assist a volunteer that
> wants to build Windows binaries, but AFAIK, the position of the
> project has not changed about our desire to take any kind of ownership
> of said binaries.  Also, assuming that these binaries include things
> like Neon, libintl and BDB I assume they still cannot be distributed
> from ASF hardware and would have to be hosted elsewhere for download.

For a 1.7, why would these have to be requirements?

We can create binaries that don't use any of those dependencies...  -- justin

Reply via email to