On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 7:26 AM, Ruediger Pluem <rpl...@apache.org> wrote: > This sounds like a valid point.
Yup. My fault -- sorry! > I would propose to revert r817810 / r817809 (for 1.3.x / 1.4.x) and only > keep r817806 (trunk). Graham? > IMHO we can backport this again later if the problem is sorted out in trunk. Well, the suggested fix of using a sibling pool to the hash table's pool would work, I think -- I'd be happy to prepare patches to implement that. But I also wouldn't object to just backing out the change from the stable branches. I wonder if, for APR2, it might make sense to change the pool cleanup behavior so that cleanup handlers for sub-pools are invoked, then for parent pools up the hierarchy, and only after all cleanup handlers are invoked is any memory actually reclaimed. Neil
