Hi all, +1 (non-binding) for *Variant 1 (small)*
Gruß Martin | mawiesne On 2026/01/29 09:35:56 Richard Zowalla wrote: > > Hi, > > The wasn’t much feedback on [1], so I am going to proceed as proposed in the > thread: > > 1. We run a formal vote (var1_small vs var_3) on the list > 2. We fine-tune the „winning“ logo (so it shows up nicely) > 3. We proceed with the rollout. > > For this reason, I am going to call a VOTE to decide on the future logo of > Apache StormCrawler. > > Based on our discussion before [2], the variants under vote are Variant 1 > (Small) and Variant 3. > > Here is the overview again: > > Variant 1 (small icon): > https://github.com/apache/stormcrawler-site/blob/new-logo-candidates/img/all-var1.svg > > Favicon: > https://github.com/apache/stormcrawler-site/blob/new-logo-candidates/img/favicon-var1.png > > Variant 3: > https://github.com/apache/stormcrawler-site/blob/new-logo-candidates/img/all.svg > Favicon (needed to square the spider): > https://github.com/apache/stormcrawler-site/blob/new-logo-candidates/img/favicon-var3.png > > We conduct a simple majority votes (according to the usual voting rules). > The vote is open for at least 72 hours or as long as needed. > > Only votes from the StormCrawler PMC are binding, but everyone is welcome to > vote. > The logo with at least three binding +1 votes will be chosen. > > Please VOTE > > [+1] go for {LOGO_VARIANT} > [+0] meh, don't care > [-1] stop, I don’t like any of the proposed logos. > > Gruß > Richard > > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/qf63pfzrn2m5klmfwj7cpyqlkc8pbtym > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/x2lzn9jojo9ms09cml49648y3y35rph2 > >
