+1 for variant 3 (binding)
On 1/29/26 11:35, Richard Zowalla wrote:
Hi,
The wasn’t much feedback on [1], so I am going to proceed as proposed in the
thread:
1. We run a formal vote (var1_small vs var_3) on the list
2. We fine-tune the „winning“ logo (so it shows up nicely)
3. We proceed with the rollout.
For this reason, I am going to call a VOTE to decide on the future logo of
Apache StormCrawler.
Based on our discussion before [2], the variants under vote are Variant 1
(Small) and Variant 3.
Here is the overview again:
Variant 1 (small icon):
https://github.com/apache/stormcrawler-site/blob/new-logo-candidates/img/all-var1.svg
Favicon:
https://github.com/apache/stormcrawler-site/blob/new-logo-candidates/img/favicon-var1.png
Variant 3:
https://github.com/apache/stormcrawler-site/blob/new-logo-candidates/img/all.svg
Favicon (needed to square the spider):
https://github.com/apache/stormcrawler-site/blob/new-logo-candidates/img/favicon-var3.png
We conduct a simple majority votes (according to the usual voting rules).
The vote is open for at least 72 hours or as long as needed.
Only votes from the StormCrawler PMC are binding, but everyone is welcome to
vote.
The logo with at least three binding +1 votes will be chosen.
Please VOTE
[+1] go for {LOGO_VARIANT}
[+0] meh, don't care
[-1] stop, I don’t like any of the proposed logos.
Gruß
Richard
[1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/qf63pfzrn2m5klmfwj7cpyqlkc8pbtym
[2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/x2lzn9jojo9ms09cml49648y3y35rph2
