Agree, the vote does pass [1] - and 4.1 is ready to be released : we can include verbiage in release notes on known issues. A 4.1.1, as a fast follow as Hyukjin proposed, can be used to address any critical known issues.
Regards, Mridul [1] I did not vote, as I am on vacation, but 4.1 contains multiple important features and bug fixes. On Wed, Dec 17, 2025 at 7:25 AM Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm +1 for Hyukjin's suggestion. > > Dongjoon. > > On 2025/12/17 01:34:59 Hyukjin Kwon wrote: > > Let me just start 4.1.1 if we're fine with it. I think that would be > easier > > and quicker. > > > > On Wed, Dec 17, 2025 at 11:28 AM Hyukjin Kwon <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > Can we simply start 4.1.1 with news explaining the issue? I think we > > > (rather I) did like that before > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 17, 2025 at 3:44 AM Holden Karau <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> I also had assumed that the release was being held up based on the > > >> discussion (not sure what I would have voted but given the discussion > > >> around the regression I was holding off on digging in more because > I’m on a > > >> mini vacation). > > >> > > >> Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau > > >> Fight Health Insurance: https://www.fighthealthinsurance.com/ > > >> <https://www.fighthealthinsurance.com/?q=hk_email> > > >> Books (Learning Spark, High Performance Spark, etc.): > > >> https://amzn.to/2MaRAG9 <https://amzn.to/2MaRAG9> > > >> YouTube Live Streams: https://www.youtube.com/user/holdenkarau > > >> Pronouns: she/her > > >> > > >> > > >> On Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 9:42 AM Wenchen Fan <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >> > > >>> Although the rule is “more +1 than −1”, could we proceed in good > faith? > > >>> I’m following the voting thread and hoping to see how the discussion > > >>> evolves. I didn’t expect the vote to be closed so suddenly while the > > >>> discussion is still ongoing; otherwise, I would have cast a −1. > > >>> > > >>> On Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 10:04 PM Sean Owen <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> (Release vote criteria is "more +1 than -1", FWIW) > > >>>> I also do not understand the hurry here. Just finish up the change > and > > >>>> re-roll a RC like we've done 100 times before. > > >>>> What is the special circumstance for this RC to rush it? > > >>>> > > >>>> On Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 7:18 AM Herman van Hovell via dev < > > >>>> [email protected]> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> Dongjoon, > > >>>>> > > >>>>> I am not sure I follow. I have voted -1 on the release. I am a PMC > > >>>>> member so that is a binding vote. Please cut a new RC and put it > for > > >>>>> another vote. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Kind regards, > > >>>>> Herman > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 7:29 AM Dongjoon Hyun < > [email protected]> > > >>>>> wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> The vote passes with 6 +1s (3 binding +1s). > > >>>>>> Thanks to all who helped with the release! > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> (* = binding) > > >>>>>> +1: > > >>>>>> - Dongjoon Hyun * > > >>>>>> - Peter Toth > > >>>>>> - Kent Yao * > > >>>>>> - Yang Jie * > > >>>>>> - Jules Damji > > >>>>>> - Scott > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> +0: None > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> -1: None > > >>>>>> - Herman van Hovell > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe e-mail: [email protected] > >
