I also had assumed that the release was being held up based on the
discussion (not sure what I would have voted but given the discussion
around the regression I was holding off on digging in more because I’m on a
mini vacation).

Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau
Fight Health Insurance: https://www.fighthealthinsurance.com/
<https://www.fighthealthinsurance.com/?q=hk_email>
Books (Learning Spark, High Performance Spark, etc.):
https://amzn.to/2MaRAG9  <https://amzn.to/2MaRAG9>
YouTube Live Streams: https://www.youtube.com/user/holdenkarau
Pronouns: she/her


On Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 9:42 AM Wenchen Fan <[email protected]> wrote:

> Although the rule is “more +1 than −1”, could we proceed in good faith?
> I’m following the voting thread and hoping to see how the discussion
> evolves. I didn’t expect the vote to be closed so suddenly while the
> discussion is still ongoing; otherwise, I would have cast a −1.
>
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 10:04 PM Sean Owen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> (Release vote criteria is "more +1 than -1", FWIW)
>> I also do not understand the hurry here. Just finish up the change and
>> re-roll a RC like we've done 100 times before.
>> What is the special circumstance for this RC to rush it?
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 7:18 AM Herman van Hovell via dev <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Dongjoon,
>>>
>>> I am not sure I follow. I have voted -1 on the release. I am a PMC
>>> member so that is a binding vote. Please cut a new RC and put it for
>>> another vote.
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>> Herman
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 7:29 AM Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The vote passes with 6 +1s (3 binding +1s).
>>>> Thanks to all who helped with the release!
>>>>
>>>> (* = binding)
>>>> +1:
>>>> - Dongjoon Hyun *
>>>> - Peter Toth
>>>> - Kent Yao *
>>>> - Yang Jie *
>>>> - Jules Damji
>>>> - Scott
>>>>
>>>> +0: None
>>>>
>>>> -1: None
>>>> - Herman van Hovell
>>>>
>>>

Reply via email to