I volunteer to be a release manager of 3.0.1, if nobody is working on this.
------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------ 发件人: "Gengliang Wang"<[email protected]>; 发送时间: 2020年6月24日(星期三) 下午4:15 收件人: "Hyukjin Kwon"<[email protected]>; 抄送: "Dongjoon Hyun"<[email protected]>;"Jungtaek Lim"<[email protected]>;"Jules Damji"<[email protected]>;"Holden Karau"<[email protected]>;"Reynold Xin"<[email protected]>;"Shivaram Venkataraman"<[email protected]>;"Yuanjian Li"<[email protected]>;"Spark dev list"<[email protected]>;"Takeshi Yamamuro"<[email protected]>; 主题: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Spark 3.0.1 Release +1, the issues mentioned are really serious. On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 7:56 PM Hyukjin Kwon <[email protected]> wrote: +1. Just as a note, - SPARK-31918 is fixed now, and there's no blocker. - When we build SparkR, we should use the latest R version at least 4.0.0+. 2020년 6월 24일 (수) 오전 11:20, Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]>님이 작성: +1 Bests, Dongjoon. On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 1:19 PM Jungtaek Lim <[email protected]> wrote: +1 on a 3.0.1 soon. Probably it would be nice if some Scala experts can take a look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-32051 and include the fix into 3.0.1 if possible. Looks like APIs designed to work with Scala 2.11 & Java bring ambiguity in Scala 2.12 & Java. On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 4:52 AM Jules Damji <[email protected]> wrote: +1 (non-binding) Sent from my iPhonePardon the dumb thumb typos :) On Jun 23, 2020, at 11:36 AM, Holden Karau <[email protected]> wrote: +1 on a patch release soon On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 10:47 AM Reynold Xin <[email protected]> wrote: +1 on doing a new patch release soon. I saw some of these issues when preparing the 3.0 release, and some of them are very serious. On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 8:06 AM, Shivaram Venkataraman <[email protected]> wrote: +1 Thanks Yuanjian -- I think it'll be great to have a 3.0.1 release soon. Shivaram On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 3:43 AM Takeshi Yamamuro <[email protected]> wrote: Thanks for the heads-up, Yuanjian! I also noticed branch-3.0 already has 39 commits after Spark 3.0.0. wow, the updates are so quick. Anyway, +1 for the release. Bests, Takeshi On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 4:59 PM Yuanjian Li <[email protected]> wrote: Hi dev-list, I’m writing this to raise the discussion about Spark 3.0.1 feasibility since 4 blocker issues were found after Spark 3.0.0: [SPARK-31990] The state store compatibility broken will cause a correctness issue when Streaming query with `dropDuplicate` uses the checkpoint written by the old Spark version. [SPARK-32038] The regression bug in handling NaN values in COUNT(DISTINCT) [SPARK-31918][WIP] CRAN requires to make it working with the latest R 4.0. It makes the 3.0 release unavailable on CRAN, and only supports R [3.5, 4.0) [SPARK-31967] Downgrade vis.js to fix Jobs UI loading time regression I also noticed branch-3.0 already has 39 commits after Spark 3.0.0. I think it would be great if we have Spark 3.0.1 to deliver the critical fixes. Any comments are appreciated. Best, Yuanjian -- --- Takeshi Yamamuro --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe e-mail: [email protected] -- Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau Books (Learning Spark, High Performance Spark, etc.): https://amzn.to/2MaRAG9 YouTube Live Streams: https://www.youtube.com/user/holdenkarau
