+1, the issues mentioned are really serious.

On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 7:56 PM Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1.
>
> Just as a note,
> - SPARK-31918 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31918> is
> fixed now, and there's no blocker. - When we build SparkR, we should use
> the latest R version at least 4.0.0+.
>
> 2020년 6월 24일 (수) 오전 11:20, Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon.h...@gmail.com>님이 작성:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Bests,
>> Dongjoon.
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 1:19 PM Jungtaek Lim <
>> kabhwan.opensou...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 on a 3.0.1 soon.
>>>
>>> Probably it would be nice if some Scala experts can take a look at
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-32051 and include the fix
>>> into 3.0.1 if possible.
>>> Looks like APIs designed to work with Scala 2.11 & Java bring
>>> ambiguity in Scala 2.12 & Java.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 4:52 AM Jules Damji <dmat...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>> Pardon the dumb thumb typos :)
>>>>
>>>> On Jun 23, 2020, at 11:36 AM, Holden Karau <hol...@pigscanfly.ca>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> 
>>>> +1 on a patch release soon
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 10:47 AM Reynold Xin <r...@databricks.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 on doing a new patch release soon. I saw some of these issues when
>>>>> preparing the 3.0 release, and some of them are very serious.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 8:06 AM, Shivaram Venkataraman <
>>>>> shiva...@eecs.berkeley.edu> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 Thanks Yuanjian -- I think it'll be great to have a 3.0.1 release
>>>>>> soon.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Shivaram
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 3:43 AM Takeshi Yamamuro <
>>>>>> linguin....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for the heads-up, Yuanjian!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I also noticed branch-3.0 already has 39 commits after Spark 3.0.0.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> wow, the updates are so quick. Anyway, +1 for the release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bests,
>>>>>> Takeshi
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 4:59 PM Yuanjian Li <xyliyuanj...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi dev-list,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I’m writing this to raise the discussion about Spark 3.0.1
>>>>>> feasibility since 4 blocker issues were found after Spark 3.0.0:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [SPARK-31990] The state store compatibility broken will cause a
>>>>>> correctness issue when Streaming query with `dropDuplicate` uses the
>>>>>> checkpoint written by the old Spark version.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [SPARK-32038] The regression bug in handling NaN values in
>>>>>> COUNT(DISTINCT)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [SPARK-31918][WIP] CRAN requires to make it working with the latest R
>>>>>> 4.0. It makes the 3.0 release unavailable on CRAN, and only supports R
>>>>>> [3.5, 4.0)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [SPARK-31967] Downgrade vis.js to fix Jobs UI loading time regression
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I also noticed branch-3.0 already has 39 commits after Spark 3.0.0. I
>>>>>> think it would be great if we have Spark 3.0.1 to deliver the critical
>>>>>> fixes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any comments are appreciated.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yuanjian
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> Takeshi Yamamuro
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau
>>>> Books (Learning Spark, High Performance Spark, etc.):
>>>> https://amzn.to/2MaRAG9  <https://amzn.to/2MaRAG9>
>>>> YouTube Live Streams: https://www.youtube.com/user/holdenkarau
>>>>
>>>>

Reply via email to