Thanks for the kind explanation. I see and it looks ok to me. On Sun, Sep 8, 2019 at 1:54 PM Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for checking it. > > I think it's fine by two reasons below: > > 1. It has another condition for such cases - one year time range. > Basically, such PRs have not been merged for one year, which I believe > are not likely merged soon. > The JIRA status will be updated when such PRs are merged anyway. > > 2. The JIRAs and PRs ideally should be updated. If the PR authors forgot > to update affected versions, > it could be a good ping to update the affected versions in its JIRA, > which is a good practice I believe. > > FWIW, currently setting 'in-Progress' doesn't properly work. It has been > few months. > I raised this issue several times at > http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/In-Apache-Spark-JIRA-spark-dev-github-jira-sync-py-not-running-properly-td27077.html > because > it blocked me to search JIRAs. I had to change my JQL to check JIRAs. It's > still not being fixed. I don't know who to ask about this. > > If this is not being fixed, we might not have to care about 'In-Progress' > anymore. > > > 2019년 9월 8일 (일) 오후 1:31, Takeshi Yamamuro <linguin....@gmail.com>님이 작성: > >> Hi, Hyukjin, >> >> I checked entries in the list and I found that some entries have >> 'In-Progress' in their status and have oepn prs (e.g., SPARK-25211 >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-25211>). >> We can also close these PRs according to the bulk close? >> (But, we might need to check the corresponding PRs manually?) >> >> Bests, >> Takeshi >> >> >> On Sun, Sep 8, 2019 at 12:15 PM Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> HI all, >>> >>> We have resolved JIRAs that targets EOL releases (up to Spark 2.2.x) in >>> order to make it >>> the manageable size before. >>> Since Spark 2.3.4 will be EOL release, I plan to do this again roughly >>> in a week. >>> >>> The JIRAs that has not been updated for the last year, and having affect >>> version of EOL releases will be: >>> - Resolved as 'Incomplete' status >>> - Has a 'bulk-closed' label. >>> >>> I plan to use this JQL >>> >>> project = SPARK >>> AND status in (Open, "In Progress", Reopened) >>> AND ( >>> affectedVersion = EMPTY OR >>> NOT (affectedVersion in versionMatch("^3.*") >>> OR affectedVersion in versionMatch("^2.4.*") >>> ) >>> ) >>> AND updated <= -52w >>> >>> >>> You could click this link and check. >>> >>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20SPARK%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened)%20AND%20(affectedVersion%20%3D%20EMPTY%20OR%20NOT%20(affectedVersion%20in%20versionMatch(%22%5E3.*%22)%20OR%20affectedVersion%20in%20versionMatch(%22%5E2.4.*%22)))%20AND%20updated%20%3C%3D%20-52w >>> >>> Please let me know if you guys have any concern or opinion on this. >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >> >> >> -- >> --- >> Takeshi Yamamuro >> > -- --- Takeshi Yamamuro
