Should we backport https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13424 to 1.6.2 ?
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 9:02 AM andy petrella <andy.petre...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 both too > (for tomorrow lunchtime? ^^) > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 5:06 AM Raymond Honderdors < > raymond.honderd...@sizmek.com> wrote: > >> +1 for both >> >> Get Outlook for Android <https://aka.ms/ghei36> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 10:23 PM +0300, "Michael Armbrust" < >> mich...@databricks.com> wrote: >> >> +1 to both of these! >> >> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Sean Owen <so...@cloudera.com> wrote: >> >>> 1.6.2 RC seems fine to me; I don't know of outstanding issues. Clearly >>> we need to keep the 1.x line going for a bit, so a bug fix release >>> sounds good, >>> >>> Although we've got some work to do before 2.0.0 it does look like it's >>> within reach. Especially if declaring an RC creates more focus on >>> resolving the most important blocker issues -- and if we do burn those >>> down before 2.0.0 -- this sounds like a good step IMHO. >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 8:01 PM, Reynold Xin <r...@databricks.com> >>> wrote: >>> > It's been a while and we have accumulated quite a few bug fixes in >>> > branch-1.6. I'm thinking about cutting 1.6.2 rc this week. Any patches >>> > somebody want to get in last minute? >>> > >>> > On a related note, I'm thinking about cutting 2.0.0 rc this week too. I >>> > looked at the 60 unresolved tickets and almost all of them look like >>> they >>> > can be retargeted are are just some doc updates. I'm going to be more >>> > aggressive and pushing individual people about resolving those, in >>> case this >>> > drags on forever. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@spark.apache.org >>> >>> >> -- > andy >
