+1 to both of these! On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Sean Owen <so...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> 1.6.2 RC seems fine to me; I don't know of outstanding issues. Clearly > we need to keep the 1.x line going for a bit, so a bug fix release > sounds good, > > Although we've got some work to do before 2.0.0 it does look like it's > within reach. Especially if declaring an RC creates more focus on > resolving the most important blocker issues -- and if we do burn those > down before 2.0.0 -- this sounds like a good step IMHO. > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 8:01 PM, Reynold Xin <r...@databricks.com> wrote: > > It's been a while and we have accumulated quite a few bug fixes in > > branch-1.6. I'm thinking about cutting 1.6.2 rc this week. Any patches > > somebody want to get in last minute? > > > > On a related note, I'm thinking about cutting 2.0.0 rc this week too. I > > looked at the 60 unresolved tickets and almost all of them look like they > > can be retargeted are are just some doc updates. I'm going to be more > > aggressive and pushing individual people about resolving those, in case > this > > drags on forever. > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@spark.apache.org > >
