I think the risk is everybody starts following this, then this will be unmanageable, given the size of the number of organizations involved.
The two main labels that we actually use are starter + releasenotes. On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Sean Owen <so...@cloudera.com> wrote: > >> I don't think we generally use labels at all except "starter". I >> sometimes remove labels when I'm editing a JIRA otherwise, perhaps to >> make that point. I don't recall doing this recently. >> > > We have used for other things in the past, like to identify the big-endian > related issues > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-15154?jql=labels%20%3D%20big-endian > > >> However I'd say they should not be used to tag JIRAs for your internal >> purposes. Have you looked at things like JIRA Client from Almworks? >> It's free and I highly recommend it, and IIRC it lets you manage some >> private labels locally. >> >> > The issue with maintaining anything locally is that then it's not easily > sharable (e.g. I can't just send a link to a query) > > > > The question is more like, what issues can be caused by using labels ? > > > -- > Luciano Resende > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ >
