Yeah I think using labels is fine -- just not if they're for someone's internal purpose. I don't have a problem with using meaningful labels if they're meaningful to everyone. In fact, I'd rather be using labels rather than "umbrella" JIRAs.
Labels I have removed as unuseful are ones like "patch" or "important" or "bug". "big-endian" sounds useful. The only downside is that, inevitably, a label won't be consistently applied. But such is life. On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 4:58 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Sean Owen <so...@cloudera.com> wrote: >> >> I don't think we generally use labels at all except "starter". I >> sometimes remove labels when I'm editing a JIRA otherwise, perhaps to >> make that point. I don't recall doing this recently. > > > We have used for other things in the past, like to identify the big-endian > related issues > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-15154?jql=labels%20%3D%20big-endian > >> >> However I'd say they should not be used to tag JIRAs for your internal >> purposes. Have you looked at things like JIRA Client from Almworks? >> It's free and I highly recommend it, and IIRC it lets you manage some >> private labels locally. >> > > The issue with maintaining anything locally is that then it's not easily > sharable (e.g. I can't just send a link to a query) > > > > The question is more like, what issues can be caused by using labels ? > > > -- > Luciano Resende > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@spark.apache.org
