+1. One issue with dropping Java 6: if we use Java 7 to build the assembly jar, it will use zip64. Could Python 2.x (or even 3.x) be able to load zip64 files on PYTHONPATH? -Xiangrui
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Reynold Xin <r...@databricks.com> wrote: > OK I sent an email. > > > On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 2:47 PM, shane knapp <skn...@berkeley.edu> wrote: > >> +1 to an announce to user and dev. java6 is so old and sad. >> >> On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Tom Graves <tgraves...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >>> +1. I haven't seen major objections here so I would say send announcement >>> and see if any users have objections >>> >>> Tom >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tuesday, May 5, 2015 5:09 AM, Patrick Wendell <pwend...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> If there is broad consensus here to drop Java 1.6 in Spark 1.5, should >>> we do an ANNOUNCE to user and dev? >>> >>> On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 7:24 PM, shane knapp <skn...@berkeley.edu> wrote: >>> > sgtm >>> > >>> > On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Patrick Wendell <pwend...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> If we just set JAVA_HOME in dev/run-test-jenkins, I think it should >>> work. >>> >> >>> >> On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 7:20 PM, shane knapp <skn...@berkeley.edu> >>> wrote: >>> >> > ...and now the workers all have java6 installed. >>> >> > >>> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-1437 >>> >> > >>> >> > sadly, the built-in jenkins jdk management doesn't allow us to >>> choose a >>> >> > JDK >>> >> > version within matrix projects... so we need to manage this stuff >>> >> > manually. >>> >> > >>> >> > On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 8:57 AM, shane knapp <skn...@berkeley.edu> >>> wrote: >>> >> > >>> >> >> that bug predates my time at the amplab... :) >>> >> >> >>> >> >> anyways, just to restate: jenkins currently only builds w/java 7. >>> if >>> >> >> you >>> >> >> folks need 6, i can make it happen, but it will be a (smallish) bit >>> of >>> >> >> work. >>> >> >> >>> >> >> shane >>> >> >> >>> >> >> On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 2:14 AM, Sean Owen <so...@cloudera.com> >>> wrote: >>> >> >> >>> >> >>> Should be, but isn't what Jenkins does. >>> >> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-1437 >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> At this point it might be simpler to just decide that 1.5 will >>> require >>> >> >>> Java 7 and then the Jenkins setup is correct. >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> (NB: you can also solve this by setting bootclasspath to JDK 6 libs >>> >> >>> even when using javac 7+ but I think this is overly complicated.) >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 5:52 AM, Mridul Muralidharan < >>> mri...@gmail.com> >>> >> >>> wrote: >>> >> >>> > Hi Shane, >>> >> >>> > >>> >> >>> > Since we are still maintaining support for jdk6, jenkins should >>> be >>> >> >>> > using jdk6 [1] to ensure we do not inadvertently use jdk7 or >>> higher >>> >> >>> > api which breaks source level compat. >>> >> >>> > -source and -target is insufficient to ensure api usage is >>> >> >>> > conformant >>> >> >>> > with the minimum jdk version we are supporting. >>> >> >>> > >>> >> >>> > Regards, >>> >> >>> > Mridul >>> >> >>> > >>> >> >>> > [1] Not jdk7 as you mentioned >>> >> >>> > >>> >> >>> > On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 8:53 PM, shane knapp <skn...@berkeley.edu >>> > >>> >> >>> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> that's kinda what we're doing right now, java 7 is the >>> >> >>> default/standard on >>> >> >>> >> our jenkins. >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> or, i vote we buy a butler's outfit for thomas and have a second >>> >> >>> jenkins >>> >> >>> >> instance... ;) >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> > >>> > >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@spark.apache.org >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@spark.apache.org