+1. One issue with dropping Java 6: if we use Java 7 to build the
assembly jar, it will use zip64. Could Python 2.x (or even 3.x) be
able to load zip64 files on PYTHONPATH? -Xiangrui

On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Reynold Xin <r...@databricks.com> wrote:
> OK I sent an email.
>
>
> On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 2:47 PM, shane knapp <skn...@berkeley.edu> wrote:
>
>> +1 to an announce to user and dev.  java6 is so old and sad.
>>
>> On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Tom Graves <tgraves...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1. I haven't seen major objections here so I would say send announcement
>>> and see if any users have objections
>>>
>>> Tom
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>   On Tuesday, May 5, 2015 5:09 AM, Patrick Wendell <pwend...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> If there is broad consensus here to drop Java 1.6 in Spark 1.5, should
>>> we do an ANNOUNCE to user and dev?
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 7:24 PM, shane knapp <skn...@berkeley.edu> wrote:
>>> > sgtm
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Patrick Wendell <pwend...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> If we just set JAVA_HOME in dev/run-test-jenkins, I think it should
>>> work.
>>> >>
>>> >> On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 7:20 PM, shane knapp <skn...@berkeley.edu>
>>> wrote:
>>> >> > ...and now the workers all have java6 installed.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-1437
>>> >> >
>>> >> > sadly, the built-in jenkins jdk management doesn't allow us to
>>> choose a
>>> >> > JDK
>>> >> > version within matrix projects...  so we need to manage this stuff
>>> >> > manually.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 8:57 AM, shane knapp <skn...@berkeley.edu>
>>> wrote:
>>> >> >
>>> >> >> that bug predates my time at the amplab...  :)
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> anyways, just to restate: jenkins currently only builds w/java 7.
>>> if
>>> >> >> you
>>> >> >> folks need 6, i can make it happen, but it will be a (smallish) bit
>>> of
>>> >> >> work.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> shane
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 2:14 AM, Sean Owen <so...@cloudera.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>> Should be, but isn't what Jenkins does.
>>> >> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-1437
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>> At this point it might be simpler to just decide that 1.5 will
>>> require
>>> >> >>> Java 7 and then the Jenkins setup is correct.
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>> (NB: you can also solve this by setting bootclasspath to JDK 6 libs
>>> >> >>> even when using javac 7+ but I think this is overly complicated.)
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>> On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 5:52 AM, Mridul Muralidharan <
>>> mri...@gmail.com>
>>> >> >>> wrote:
>>> >> >>> > Hi Shane,
>>> >> >>> >
>>> >> >>> >  Since we are still maintaining support for jdk6, jenkins should
>>> be
>>> >> >>> > using jdk6 [1] to ensure we do not inadvertently use jdk7 or
>>> higher
>>> >> >>> > api which breaks source level compat.
>>> >> >>> > -source and -target is insufficient to ensure api usage is
>>> >> >>> > conformant
>>> >> >>> > with the minimum jdk version we are supporting.
>>> >> >>> >
>>> >> >>> > Regards,
>>> >> >>> > Mridul
>>> >> >>> >
>>> >> >>> > [1] Not jdk7 as you mentioned
>>> >> >>> >
>>> >> >>> > On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 8:53 PM, shane knapp <skn...@berkeley.edu
>>> >
>>> >> >>> wrote:
>>> >> >>> >> that's kinda what we're doing right now, java 7 is the
>>> >> >>> default/standard on
>>> >> >>> >> our jenkins.
>>> >> >>> >>
>>> >> >>> >> or, i vote we buy a butler's outfit for thomas and have a second
>>> >> >>> jenkins
>>> >> >>> >> instance...  ;)
>>>
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@spark.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to