+1 to an announce to user and dev. java6 is so old and sad. On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Tom Graves <tgraves...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> +1. I haven't seen major objections here so I would say send announcement > and see if any users have objections > > Tom > > > > On Tuesday, May 5, 2015 5:09 AM, Patrick Wendell <pwend...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > If there is broad consensus here to drop Java 1.6 in Spark 1.5, should > we do an ANNOUNCE to user and dev? > > On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 7:24 PM, shane knapp <skn...@berkeley.edu> wrote: > > sgtm > > > > On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Patrick Wendell <pwend...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> If we just set JAVA_HOME in dev/run-test-jenkins, I think it should > work. > >> > >> On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 7:20 PM, shane knapp <skn...@berkeley.edu> > wrote: > >> > ...and now the workers all have java6 installed. > >> > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-1437 > >> > > >> > sadly, the built-in jenkins jdk management doesn't allow us to choose > a > >> > JDK > >> > version within matrix projects... so we need to manage this stuff > >> > manually. > >> > > >> > On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 8:57 AM, shane knapp <skn...@berkeley.edu> > wrote: > >> > > >> >> that bug predates my time at the amplab... :) > >> >> > >> >> anyways, just to restate: jenkins currently only builds w/java 7. if > >> >> you > >> >> folks need 6, i can make it happen, but it will be a (smallish) bit > of > >> >> work. > >> >> > >> >> shane > >> >> > >> >> On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 2:14 AM, Sean Owen <so...@cloudera.com> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> Should be, but isn't what Jenkins does. > >> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-1437 > >> >>> > >> >>> At this point it might be simpler to just decide that 1.5 will > require > >> >>> Java 7 and then the Jenkins setup is correct. > >> >>> > >> >>> (NB: you can also solve this by setting bootclasspath to JDK 6 libs > >> >>> even when using javac 7+ but I think this is overly complicated.) > >> >>> > >> >>> On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 5:52 AM, Mridul Muralidharan < > mri...@gmail.com> > >> >>> wrote: > >> >>> > Hi Shane, > >> >>> > > >> >>> > Since we are still maintaining support for jdk6, jenkins should > be > >> >>> > using jdk6 [1] to ensure we do not inadvertently use jdk7 or > higher > >> >>> > api which breaks source level compat. > >> >>> > -source and -target is insufficient to ensure api usage is > >> >>> > conformant > >> >>> > with the minimum jdk version we are supporting. > >> >>> > > >> >>> > Regards, > >> >>> > Mridul > >> >>> > > >> >>> > [1] Not jdk7 as you mentioned > >> >>> > > >> >>> > On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 8:53 PM, shane knapp <skn...@berkeley.edu> > >> >>> wrote: > >> >>> >> that's kinda what we're doing right now, java 7 is the > >> >>> default/standard on > >> >>> >> our jenkins. > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> or, i vote we buy a butler's outfit for thomas and have a second > >> >>> jenkins > >> >>> >> instance... ;) > > >> >>> > >> >> > >> >> > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@spark.apache.org > > > > >
