I agree with Sean I just compiled spark core successfully with 7u71 in Mac OS X
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 1:11 PM, Josh Rosen <rosenvi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ah, that makes sense. I had forgotten that there was a JIRA for this: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-4021 > > On October 21, 2014 at 10:08:58 AM, Patrick Wendell (pwend...@gmail.com) > wrote: > > Josh - the errors that broke our build indicated that JDK5 was being > used. Somehow the upgrade caused our build to use a much older Java > version. See the JIRA for more details. > > On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Josh Rosen <rosenvi...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > I find it concerning that there's a JDK version that breaks out build, > since > > we're supposed to support Java 7. Is 7u71 an upgrade or downgrade from > the > > JDK that we used before? Is there an easy way to fix our build so that > it > > compiles with 7u71's stricter settings? > > > > I'm not sure why the "New" PRB is failing here. It was originally > created > > as a clone of the main pull request builder job. I checked the > configuration > > history and confirmed that there aren't any settings that we've > forgotten to > > copy over (e.g. their configurations haven't diverged), so I'm not sure > > what's causing this. > > > > - Josh > > > > On October 21, 2014 at 6:35:39 AM, Nan Zhu (zhunanmcg...@gmail.com) > wrote: > > > > weird.....two buildings (one triggered by New, one triggered by Old) > were > > executed in the same node, amp-jenkins-slave-01, one compiles, one > not... > > > > Best, > > > > -- > > Nan Zhu > > > > > > On Tuesday, October 21, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Nan Zhu wrote: > > > >> seems that all PRs built by NewSparkPRBuilder suffers from 7u71, while > >> SparkPRBuilder is working fine > >> > >> Best, > >> > >> -- > >> Nan Zhu > >> > >> > >> On Tuesday, October 21, 2014 at 9:22 AM, Cheng Lian wrote: > >> > >> > It's a new pull request builder written by Josh, integrated into our > >> > state-of-the-art PR dashboard :) > >> > > >> > On 10/21/14 9:33 PM, Nan Zhu wrote: > >> > > just curious...what is this "NewSparkPullRequestBuilder"? > >> > > > >> > > Best, > >> > > > >> > > -- > >> > > Nan Zhu > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > On Tuesday, October 21, 2014 at 8:30 AM, Cheng Lian wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > Hm, seems that 7u71 comes back again. Observed similar Kinesis > >> > > > compilation error just now: > >> > > > > https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/410/consoleFull > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > Checked Jenkins slave nodes, saw /usr/java/latest points to > >> > > > jdk1.7.0_71. However, /usr/bin/javac -version says: > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Eclipse Java Compiler 0.894_R34x, 3.4.2 release, Copyright IBM > >> > > > > Corp 2000, 2008. All rights reserved. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > Which JDK is actually used by Jenkins? > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > Cheng > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > On 10/21/14 8:28 AM, shane knapp wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > > ok, so earlier today i installed a 2nd JDK within jenkins > (7u71), > >> > > > > which fixed the SparkR build but apparently made Spark itself > quite unhappy. > >> > > > > i removed that JDK, triggered a build ( > >> > > > > > https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21943/console), > > >> > > > > and it compiled kinesis w/o dying a fiery death. apparently > 7u71 is stricter > >> > > > > when compiling. sad times. sorry about that! shane On Mon, Oct > 20, 2014 at > >> > > > > 5:16 PM, Patrick Wendell <pwend...@gmail.com> (mailto: > pwend...@gmail.com) > >> > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > The failure is in the Kinesis compoent, can you reproduce > this > >> > > > > > if you build with -Pkinesis-asl? - Patrick On Mon, Oct 20, > 2014 at 5:08 PM, > >> > > > > > shane knapp <skn...@berkeley.edu> (mailto:skn...@berkeley.edu) > wrote: > >> > > > > > > hmm, strange. i'll take a look. On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at > 5:11 > >> > > > > > > PM, Nan Zhu <zhunanmcg...@gmail.com> (mailto: > zhunanmcg...@gmail.com) wrote: > >> > > > > > > > yes, I can compile locally, too but it seems that Jenkins > is > >> > > > > > > > not happy now... > >> > > > > > > > > https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/ All > >> > > > > > > > failed to compile Best, -- Nan Zhu On Monday, October 20, > 2014 at 7:56 PM, > >> > > > > > > > Ted Yu wrote: > >> > > > > > > > > I performed build on latest master branch but didn't > get > >> > > > > > > > > compilation > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > error. > >> > > > > > > > > FYI On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Nan Zhu > >> > > > > > > > > <zhunanmcg...@gmail.com (mailto:zhunanmcg...@gmail.com) > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > (mailto:zhunanmcg...@gmail.com)> wrote: > >> > > > > > > > > > Hi, I just submitted a patch > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2864/files > >> > > > > > > > > > with one line change but the Jenkins told me it's > failed > >> > > > > > > > > > to compile on the unrelated > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > files? > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21935/console > >> > > > > > > > > > Best, Nan > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >
