weird…..two buildings (one triggered by New, one triggered by Old) were executed in the same node, amp-jenkins-slave-01, one compiles, one not…
Best, -- Nan Zhu On Tuesday, October 21, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Nan Zhu wrote: > seems that all PRs built by NewSparkPRBuilder suffers from 7u71, while > SparkPRBuilder is working fine > > Best, > > -- > Nan Zhu > > > On Tuesday, October 21, 2014 at 9:22 AM, Cheng Lian wrote: > > > It's a new pull request builder written by Josh, integrated into our > > state-of-the-art PR dashboard :) > > > > On 10/21/14 9:33 PM, Nan Zhu wrote: > > > just curious…what is this “NewSparkPullRequestBuilder”? > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > -- > > > Nan Zhu > > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, October 21, 2014 at 8:30 AM, Cheng Lian wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hm, seems that 7u71 comes back again. Observed similar Kinesis > > > > compilation error just now: > > > > https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/410/consoleFull > > > > > > > > > > > > Checked Jenkins slave nodes, saw /usr/java/latest points to > > > > jdk1.7.0_71. However, /usr/bin/javac -version says: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Eclipse Java Compiler 0.894_R34x, 3.4.2 release, Copyright IBM Corp > > > > > 2000, 2008. All rights reserved. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Which JDK is actually used by Jenkins? > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheng > > > > > > > > > > > > On 10/21/14 8:28 AM, shane knapp wrote: > > > > > > > > > ok, so earlier today i installed a 2nd JDK within jenkins (7u71), > > > > > which fixed the SparkR build but apparently made Spark itself quite > > > > > unhappy. i removed that JDK, triggered a build ( > > > > > https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21943/console), > > > > > and it compiled kinesis w/o dying a fiery death. apparently 7u71 is > > > > > stricter when compiling. sad times. sorry about that! shane On Mon, > > > > > Oct 20, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Patrick Wendell <pwend...@gmail.com> > > > > > (mailto:pwend...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > > > > The failure is in the Kinesis compoent, can you reproduce this if > > > > > > you build with -Pkinesis-asl? - Patrick On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at > > > > > > 5:08 PM, shane knapp <skn...@berkeley.edu> > > > > > > (mailto:skn...@berkeley.edu) wrote: > > > > > > > hmm, strange. i'll take a look. On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 5:11 PM, > > > > > > > Nan Zhu <zhunanmcg...@gmail.com> (mailto:zhunanmcg...@gmail.com) > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > yes, I can compile locally, too but it seems that Jenkins is > > > > > > > > not happy now... > > > > > > > > https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/ > > > > > > > > All failed to compile Best, -- Nan Zhu On Monday, October 20, > > > > > > > > 2014 at 7:56 PM, Ted Yu wrote: > > > > > > > > > I performed build on latest master branch but didn't get > > > > > > > > > compilation > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > error. > > > > > > > > > FYI On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Nan Zhu > > > > > > > > > <zhunanmcg...@gmail.com (mailto:zhunanmcg...@gmail.com) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (mailto:zhunanmcg...@gmail.com)> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi, I just submitted a patch > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2864/files > > > > > > > > > > with one line change but the Jenkins told me it's failed to > > > > > > > > > > compile on the unrelated > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > files? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21935/console > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best, Nan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
