On Wednesday, January 22, 2025 7:28:56 AM Central European Standard Time Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > Hi,
Hi *, > we need to gather alignment on our approach to Jakarta Servlet. For > discussions on the options please refer to the recent mail threads about > this topic. There are pros and cons for every option, but this proposal > is msot likely the best option for our users. > > I think the best way way to gather the alignment is a simple vote. So > here we are. > > The proposal is to: > - target at least Jakarta Servlet 6 (depending on timing we might also > go to Jakarta Servlet 6.1) > - due to Jakarta Servlet 6, we increase the minimum required Java > version to Java 17 > - duplicate all non deprecated API that uses javax.servlet and create a > variation for jakarta.servlet (see [1] on how this looks for the API) > - our implementation continue to support the javax.servlet based API and > in addition support the jakarta.servlet based API (fully compatible) > > Please cast your votes. I'll leave this vote open until the 31st of January. ±0 (I prefer to have a Servlet-free core to easier support alternative request/response implementations and baking.) Regards, O. > Regards > Carsten > > [1] https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-api/pull/55
