+1 Konrad
> On 22. Jan 2025, at 07:28, Carsten Ziegeler <cziege...@apache.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > we need to gather alignment on our approach to Jakarta Servlet. For > discussions on the options please refer to the recent mail threads about this > topic. There are pros and cons for every option, but this proposal is msot > likely the best option for our users. > > I think the best way way to gather the alignment is a simple vote. So here we > are. > > The proposal is to: > - target at least Jakarta Servlet 6 (depending on timing we might also go to > Jakarta Servlet 6.1) > - due to Jakarta Servlet 6, we increase the minimum required Java version to > Java 17 > - duplicate all non deprecated API that uses javax.servlet and create a > variation for jakarta.servlet (see [1] on how this looks for the API) > - our implementation continue to support the javax.servlet based API and in > addition support the jakarta.servlet based API (fully compatible) > > Please cast your votes. I'll leave this vote open until the 31st of January. > > Regards > Carsten > > [1] https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-api/pull/55 > -- > Carsten Ziegeler > Adobe > cziege...@apache.org >
