The vote of SEP-12: Integration Test Framework had been open more than 5
days and we got +1 (binding)
x 4 and +1 (non-binding) x 3.

SEP Integration Test Framework officially passed the VOTE!

Thanks!
Sanil Jain

On 23 May 2018 at 18:11, Sanil Jain <sanil.jai...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Yi,
>
> - Event Builder Stream (p2): This will be part of different SEP, so we can
> discuss alternatives then, but yea this system will leverage InMemorySystem
> - Closable Task: sure will update it
> - CollectionStreamSystem will be now changed to CollectionStreamSystemSpec
> as per the discussion
>
> Please let me know if any concerns.
>
> Thanks
>
> Sanil
>
> On 17 May 2018 at 17:05, Yi Pan <nickpa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi, Sanil,
>>
>> Thanks for the proposal! Overall, looks good to me. Here a few minor
>> comments:
>>
>> - Event Builder Stream (p2): why do we need this instead of injecting
>> events along w/ messages/timer function in CollectionStream?
>>
>> - Closable Task: if there is a per-task system resource opened, close()
>> should close it (in the expected result column)
>>
>> - Why do we use CollectionStreamSystem? Prefer to rename it to
>> CollectionStreamFactory to avoid the confusion to Samza’s input / output
>> systems.
>>
>> - related, I think that the following code would make more sense with
>> CollectionStreamFactory in the test code examples:
>>
>> {code}
>>
>> CollectionStreamFactory factory = new CollectionStreamFactory(…);
>>
>> CollectionStream output = factory.createOutput(“test”, “output”);
>>
>> CollectionStream input = factory.createInput(“test”, “input”, {1,2,3,4});
>>
>> …
>>
>> {code}
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> -Yi
>>
>> On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 11:57 AM, Fred Haifeng Ji <haifeng...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > +1
>> >
>> > On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 11:54 AM, santhosh venkat <
>> > santhoshvenkat1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > +1.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks.
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 10:13 AM, Jacob Maes <jacob.m...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > +1
>> > > >
>> > > > On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 9:56 AM, Jagadish Venkatraman <
>> > > > jagadish1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Thanks Sanil for the proposal. This will go a long way in
>> simplifying
>> > > > > testing of Samza applications.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > +1 (binding)
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 9:45 AM, Daniel Nishimura <
>> > > dnishim...@gmail.com>
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > +1
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Looks great!
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 9:08 AM, Xinyu Liu <
>> xinyuliu...@gmail.com>
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > +1
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > The proposal looks great to me. Look forward to seeing the
>> > > > > > implementation.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Thanks,
>> > > > > > > Xinyu
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 6:12 PM, Sanil Jain <
>> > > sanil.jai...@gmail.com>
>> > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Hi All,
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > This is a call for a vote for Samza's Integration Test
>> > Framework
>> > > as
>> > > > > > > > described by:
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SAMZA/SEP-
>> > > > > > > > 12%3A+Integration+Test+Framework
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > The vote will be open for 3 days (ending at 6:00PM Monday,
>> > > > > 05/21/2018).
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Link to the discuss mailing thread:
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/samza-dev/201805.
>> > mbox/%
>> > > > > > > > 3CDM5PR21MB02827A6FA9F47CB8EF99A339A2810%40DM5PR21MB0282.
>> > > > > > > > namprd21.prod.outlook.com%3E
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Please vote:
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > [ ] +1 approve
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Thanks
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > --
>> > > > > Jagadish V,
>> > > > > Graduate Student,
>> > > > > Department of Computer Science,
>> > > > > Stanford University
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Haifeng (Fred)  Ji
>> >
>>
>
>

Reply via email to